Supes snub rules to OK project
By PAUL JACOBS - For The Californian - Dec. 7, 2008
The profile of an Indian is on Temecula's city seal to
honor American Indian history in Southwest County. "Temecula" is
from a Luiseno word that roughly translates to, "Where the sun shines through
the mist."
American Indian ancestral artifacts are strewn throughout this
region and most developers are respectful of the desire to protect these
precious pieces of the past ---- not because they enjoy the expense and delays
that come with preserving archeological resources, but because it is the law as
part of the California Environmental Quality Act.
Before grading land and
forever destroying bits of history, a qualified archeologist must be hired to
assess potential impacts and mitigation measures before proceeding with the
project. In September 2004, John Choate, president of the Procinctu Group that
is building a paramilitary training facility in Homeland, told the Pechanga Band
of Luiseno Indians that he planned to build "a house and a couple other
structures on the property" according to documents filed with the
county.
In a letter of reply, the Pechanga requested notification if a
different project was proposed. According to a September letter from Choate's
cultural resources consultant, Jean A. Keller, this was not done.
In a
list of the consultant's recommendations, No. 5 states, "Collect the broken
metate (33-15009) and all artifacts currently used as yard decorations ... and
maintain in a secure facility until arrangements for curation or donation to a
local Native American tribe are finalized."
This paragraph is crossed out
with "No!" handwritten underneath. The consultant and Choate signed the letter.
I seriously doubt that the consultant rejected her own recommendation with an
exclamation point.
It is amazing that the county has fast-tracked the
building of a private military training camp in Homeland, while it has taken
years for a water park in Temecula to get through the approval process because
of the variance in land use.
County supervisors cavalierly pushed the
environmental act and other regulations aside in order to approve a privatized
facility for law enforcement and military personnel that will include simulated
combat and live-fire operations in the tranquil area of Homeland, formerly zoned
for residential and agricultural use.
How can such a drastic change in
zoning and land use just get rushed through the process? Why should a private
law-and-order facility get to bend all the rules?
It is unconscionable
that the local bands of American Indians were not notified sooner that Choate
intends to build 30 structures instead of the original three. These oversights
probably happen all the time when projects are rushed through the county's
planning and approval process. I wonder how many conditions of approval will be
ignored once the military exercises begin?
It may take years to build a
water park in Temecula, but the public is notified and has their say in the
approval process in the way a government of the people is supposed to
operate.
Riverside County has gone rogue when it comes to approving
virtually any development project presented. Zoning, public safety and Indian
artifacts are all bumps in the road made smooth by shortsighted
politicians.
Paul Jacobs of Temecula is a regular columnist for The
Californian. E-mail him at TemeculaPaul@aol.com.