Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians of California

September 8, 2010: Workshop #2 Alternative Projects

 

August 30, 2010: Declaration of Councilmember Butt

The draft hiring agreements contain an objective, not a guarantee. Paragraph 5.4 of Exhibit E states: The Tribe hereby covenants and agrees that, for initial hires it will hire at least one third of its operational, non-management positions for the Casino and Casino Hotel from a pool of Richmond residents who otherwise meetallofthe qualifications of emplovment established by the Tribe and who are referred to the Tribe by Richmond Works (a program operated by the City) availability of a sufficient pool of qualified applicants and in accordance with applicable federal and state law. Nothing herein shall require the Tribe to maintain a workforce with any specified number of Richmond residents or to fill any positions vacated by resignation, retirement or termination with Richmond residents.

August 23, 2010: Petition for Writ of Mandate

Donald Goseny v Joan Garrett, Jeff Ritterman, Andre Soto, Gayle McLaughlin and Kenneth David Mr. Goseny sues the opponents of the casino alledging misleading and false statements. The CASINO Opponents WIN!

NOVEMBER Election 2010: MEASURE "U"

Shall the City of Richmond approve a project including a casino at Point Molate, provided that this advisory measure is considered in a manner consistent with all the City’s legal obligations? ARGUMENTS AND REBUTTALS ATTACHED.

August 2010: CSAC on Guidiville Restored Lands

CSAC’s policy with respect to gaming on restored lands is one that reflects the importance of local government and individual tribal government relationships and the uniqueness of each local situation. Specifically, CSAC opposes the practice commonly referred to as “reservation shopping” where a tribe seeks to place land into trust outside its aboriginal territory over the objection of the affected county.

August 2010: Leaked Indian Lands Determination Discovered

June 24, 2009 letter from Guidiville's Chairperson to Assistant Secretary Echohawk. That letter, obtained through a FOIA request, appears to indicate that at a meeting in June of 2009, Assistant Secretary Echohawk or his staff leaked to the Tribe a draft opinion granting the restored lands exception.

August 9, 2010: Coalition of Government to Senator Feinstein

County of Napa, Sonoma and Solano, City of San Pablo and Manchester Band of Pomo Indians

August 4, 2010: Assembly Member Skinner to United States Senators

The fee to trust process needs reform.

July 29, 2010: Pt. Molate Alternative Projects Workshop

 

July 20, 2010: City of San Pablo to City or Richmond

We urge Richmond to support another project for Pt. Molate that continues to support our good community relations, foster job creation and regional relationships, good governance between our communities.

July 19, 2010: Upstream to City of Richmond

We believe that calling for an advisory vote prior to the EIR being completed will accomplish nothing meaningful except to prejudice future decisions of future City Councils. It would therefore violate the spirit and implicit understandings of our Agreement, as well as the spirit of the 2006 CEQA Settlement with CESP and East Bay Regional Park District.

June 30, 2010: Citizens for a Sustainable Point Molate Adopt ...

and incorporate all comments made by Contra Costa County opposing the restored lands determination of the Guidiville Band at Point Molate as their OWN!

June 30, 2010: Point Molate City of Richmond Home Page

Background Information, Land Disposition Agreement with Amendments and more.

June 17, 2010: Citizens for a Sustainable Pt. Molate

Letter to Richmond City Council, Notice of a substantial violation of a central provision of the Ralph M. Brown Act, one which may jeopardize the finality of the action taken by the Richmond City Council on May 18, 2010 on items K-1 and k-2.

June 7, 2010: Requesting the STATES perspective

We ask that the Office of the Secretary of legal Affairs provide the State of California's perspective on the background and analysis of the Guidiville band's claim of restored lands at Point Molate in the City of Richmond. As Secretary of legal Affairs you have sent a number of letters that have shed light on the history and status of lands claimed as restored. Restored lands are re-acquired land, land that a tribe has historically inhabited since time immemorial and exercised governance over. Point Molate has never been a Reservation, Rancheria, Indian lands or continuously inhabited by the Guidiville Band since time immemorial.

June 1, 2010: Solutions to Fee to Trust

The problems in Richmond only evidence the many systemic flaws in the current process for taking land into trust, including a lack of clearly defined standards for trust land acquisitions, the absence of transparency in the land acquisition process including notice to and meaningful participation by local governments and the public, no open process or finite standards for determining whether new lands qualify for gaming as "restored lands" under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and no requirement for intergovernmental agreements between tribes and local governments. (Support letters attached and in related items).

May 26, 2010 Richmond City Attorney to PRA.pdf

 

May 20, 2010: Public Records Act. Request

All public comments recieved by City of Richmond regarding the DEIS for the Point Molate development and MORE

May 18, 2010: The Sixth LDA Amendment

 

May 18, 2010: Upstream Writes Concerning K1 and K2

Upstream and Guidiville will, if forced, vigorously enforce the contractual rights provided by the LDA.

May 18, 2010: Attorney Tim Taylor, Stoel Rives LLP

Writes on behalf of my clients, Andres Sotos and The Coalition to Save Point Molate regarding Agenda Items K-1 and K-2. Attorney General correctly points out, the Settlement Agreement returns all parties to the status quo ante as if the Land Distribution Agreement of 2004 had never been approved or executed. Further make available to the public all written comments on the DEIS/DEIR.

May 17, 2010: Support Agenda Item K2 and Oppose K1

Stand Up For California! encourages public discussion, information and debate about gambling and gambling proposals. We write to encourage the Honorable Council Members consider joining for public discussion "Items K-l the extension of the LDA" and "K - 2 a discussion to consider alternative plans" because the consideration of alternatives for Pt. Molate and the extension of the LDA are related. In the interest of fair, open and a transparent process, we strongly suggest placing the items at the beginning of the agenda to benefit the interested public. SEE RELATED ITEMS - CITY AGENDA AND ATTACHMENTS

May 1, 2010: California Association of Gaming Investigators and Regulators

Carl Olson, Board Officer "Today we have a Pomo Tribe wanting to move 100 miles from their 44 acre reservation near Ukiah to an area by Richmond, Ca. I would like to point out that "the restored lands exception" connot be used to give a Tribe sovereignty over land it has never governed before". This ignoring of federal law would give every Tribe in California the right to move anywhere even if it had not governed over that area. "

March 3, 2010: Response to Guidiville Band

Guidiville Band threatened litigation against Cheryl Schmit and Stand Up For California!

April 2010: Casino Poll, love me, love me not

Whitehurst/Mosher Campaign Strategy and Media – firm was hired by a coalition of card clubs. Card club opposition sounds very much like that of the coalition of tribes opposing off reservation gaming. Clearly the citizens opposition demonstrates their vote for Proposition 1A in 2000 did not support off reservation gaming or the establishment of urban tribal gaming facilities.

Feb. 25, 2010: Letter from Upstream to City of Richmond

This letter is intended to satisfy our requirement to provide a semi-annual status report on our progress under the LDA .

Feb. 17, 2010: Guidiville Band threatens litigation

 

Feb. 23, 2010:Secretary Ken Salazar and Asst. Sec Larry Echo Hawk

Stand Up For California! will demonstrate in this letter, none of the narrow exceptions of 25 U.S.C. Section 2719 including the “restored lands” exceptions is applicable to the Guidiville Indian Rancheria request. The Guidiville Indian Rancheria has its historical, archeological, geographical and cultural roots at the Guidiville Rancheria, located in Talmage, Mendocino County, near Highway 101, South of Ukiah, in California, approximately 110 miles from the proposed casino site.

Feb. 2, 2010: Recieved Response letter on prior FOIA's

Stand Up For California has received a response to the December 16, 2009 and revision on January 27, 2010 FOIA request for the Guidiville Indian Lands Determination. Paula Hart states: "We have reviewed our files and were unable to locate any records in our office responsive to your request". Internal memos are not final agency actions and thus, apparently do not exist.

Feb. 2, 2010: Mayor McLaughlin to Assemblymember Skinner

Respectfully, as Mayor of the City of Richmond, I request your assistance in approaching the Governor’s office on this complex multi-jurisdictional issue affecting state process and policy. I eagerly await your response.

Feb. 2, 2010: Follow up Letter to Ms. Paula Hart

As we discussed, I have requested a copy of the internal memo. However, since this memo is not a final agency action and is subject to change, I am advised, that there is NO Indian lands determination. Yet, as we discussed on Friday, we both know the memo exists.

Jan. 28, 2010: Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

Based on this review, there are several unresolved soil and groundwater contamination issues at the Property: Navy funding of $28.5 million may be significantly less than necessary to acheive environmental conditions that allow for regulatory closure.

Jan. 28, 2010: New Community Group Flyer

Citizens of Richmond are definitely fed up with "good old boy" politics.

Jan. 27, 2010: Follow Up FOIA Indian Lands Determination

On Jan. 19, 2010, Paul Hart, Acting Director of the Office of Indian Gaming Management requested Stand Up For California to be more specific in its request for documents regarding an Indian Lands Determination for the Guidiville at Point Molate, Richmond California. Stand Up For California has complied with that request.

Jan. 26, 2010: Marin County to George Skibine

 

Jan. 14, 2009: Manchester Point Arena Opposes Point Molate project

Press Release

Jan. 14, 2010: Numerous Agency Letters in response to DEIS

 

Jan. 10, 2010: Dear Fellow Tribal Leaders

I am writing to alert you to a pending BIA action that I believe poses a very serious and immediate threat to tribal government gaming and, even more importantly, to tribal soverignty itself; misue of the "restored lands exception" in IGRA to authorize gaming on land to which a tribe has no significant historitcal connection.

Jan. 8, 2010: Radio Show

http://kpfa.org/archive/id/57634

Jan. 7, 2010: Potential Conflict of Interest Councilmember Nat Bates

A request of City Attorney to review whether or not Nat Bates has a conflict of interest that prevents him from voting on issues related to the off reservation casnio

Pt. Molate: Citizens' Flier

 

Pt Molate Fact Sheet

 

Dec. 22, 2009: Regional Water Quality Control Board will comply with the Remand Order of the State Water Board

The Regional Water Board will rely on the DEIS/EIR when it is certified by the City of Richmond. This letter appears to leave the Governor's prior letter on approval of an early transfer a bit undone.

Dec. 16, 2009 FOIA Indian Lands Determination

Who will make and at what stage of process is the Indian Lands Determination. If there is no fee to trust application is there a need for an Indian lands determination? Will it be can it be a final agency action?

Dec. 15, 2009: AG Letter to Councilmember Tom Butt

DOJ opinion on Settlement Agreement over legality of L.D.A.

Nov. 20, 2009: PRA to Contra Costa County

Request for documents related to the development of the MOU with the Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians.

Nov. 19, 2009: County Retraction of opposition

A 1000 new pages of information, but what did it reveal - no one has said.

Nov. 16, 2009: Request to BIA to Adopt and Incorporate Land Determination Comments

Stand Up For California writes to join and incorporate by reference the comments submitted by Contra costa County on February 27, 2008, as supplemented on October 30, 2008 and April 14, 2009. Contrary to popular perception, tribes do not have the right to conduct gaming on randomly selected land. IGRA limits site selection to 25 U.S.C. Section 2701(5) where it staes that tribes may only conduct gaming on "Indian Lands," as defined at 25 U.S.C. Section 2703(4).

Nov. 12, 2009 FOIA Purchase of 1909 Rancheria.pdf

 

Nov. 10, 2009: Citizens to Save Point Molate letter to the Contra County Board of Supervisors

The coalition challenges the authority of the County to enter into an MOU without performing an adequate CEQA review.

Nov. 9, 2009: Letter to the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors

Stanton Hatch, resident of the County comments on the recent Guidiville MOU with the County

Nov. 9, 2009: Guidiville MOU - letter to BOS

Stand Up For California to the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors detailing a number of issues with the potential approval of the draft MOU.

Nov. 6, 2009 ltr Contra Costa MOU

Stand Up For California, letter to Contra costa BOS regarding potential problems with the MOU.

Nov. 5, 2009 San Pablo to Ken Salazar

City of San Pablo seeks to adopt the land determination arguments of the County of Contra Costa.

Nov. 3, 2009: City Agenda

Report on visit with the DOI regarding the proposed off reservation casino at Point Molate.

Nov. 3, 2009: New Gaming Management Agreement

Guidiville and Rumsey Management Agreement before the NIGC Balance of FOIA still forthcoming

Oct. 30, 2009: Draft MOU Contra Costa County and Guidiville

 

Oct. 23, 2009: Stand Up For California Comments DEIS

Comments prepared for Stand Up For California and Andres Soto, founding member of the Committee to Save Point Molate. STOEL RIVES LLP | 980 9th Street, Suite 1900 | Sacramento, CA 95814-3361

Oct. 23, 2009 Comments from: East Bay Chapter-Native Plant Society

 

Oct. 12, 2009: Governor Schwarzenegger Comments on Guidiville Proposed Off Reservation Casino

We write to express opposition to this land acquisition. We also address the necessity for an explicit waiver of sovereign immunity by the United States, as trustor, and the Tribe with regard to the State's right of oversight for ongoing remediation and or monitoring of the Point Molate site, should the BIA decide that any protion of such site be taken into trust for the Tribe.

Oct. 2, 2009: Demand to Open Public Comment

Tis letter is a demand to open the public comment period on the off reservation casino proposal of the Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians proposed project which is 110 miles from its established Rancheria outside of its aboriginal territory. The BIA must direct its immedate attention to this matter as it presents significant concerns regarding the corruption of an administrative process under your regulatory authority.

Sept. 30, 2009: FOIA Request of the NIGC for Guidiville Management Contract

The purpose of this request is to discover who the Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians has entered into a Management Contract with.It is well known that Harrah's is no longer involved in the Point Molate/Guidiville project. Rather it is the Rumsey Band of Wintun Indians of Yolo county currently funding the proposed project.

Sept. 30, 2009: PUBLIC Comment Extended Oct. 23, 2009

 

Sept. 18, 2009: DEISEIR Comments City of San Pablo

DEIS/EIR is inadequate

Sept. 23, 2009: California Coalition Against Gambling Expansion

Oppose Guidiville Off Reservation Project

Sept. 2009: Environmental Review of Toxins at Point Molate

 

Sept. 9, 2009: State Water Board Recission of Cleanup Order

The State Water Board rescinded the Regional Water Board’s cleanup order that everyone, including the Governor, has relied upon. It is no longer in place. The Regional Board either has to find some way to exempt it from CEQA or do an environmental review.

Sept. 1, 2009: Governor approves early transfer of Navy Lands prior to remediation of environmental cleanup

The early transfer is dependent upon the Regional Water Board Review

Sept. 22, 2009: Notice of City Council Agenda Item

Notice of an adminstrative decision to extend the comment period beyond Sept. 30, 2009.

Sept. 22, 2009: Stand Up For California requests Extension beyond Sept. 30, 2009 and a revised EIS to be recirculated

On behalf of Stand Up For California and Interested Parties - "In short by accepting a woefully truncated time frame, the EIR has deprived the public of an opportunity to comment on potential significant cumulative impacts of the project. The EIR should be revised to remedy this defect and should be recirculated to the public. "

Sept. 18, 2009: City of San Pablo Comments on DEIS

The City of San Pablo has reviewed the proposed casino development and the draft EIS Impact Report for the Point Molate Resort and Casino Project.

Sept. 2009: Notice of Extension to Sept. 30, 2009

 

Sept. 17, 2009: Developer Levine Request Extension

Extension request administrative deadline move to Sept. 30, 2009

August 12, 2009: KOA Corporation comments on Traffic

Retained by a consortium of interests concerned about the proposed Point Molate casino and resort Project to examine traffic impacts. "I have hardly ever seen a traffic impact study so devoid of helpful graphics to understand what assumptions and conclusions are being made."

Sept. 2009: Technical Peer Review of Point Molate Draft EIS/EIR Mixed Use Tribal Destination Resort and Casino

ESA performed a technical peer review of the Point Molate Mixed-Use Tribal Destination Resort and Casino Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIS/EIR). The review was conducted to determine technical adequacy in meeting the statutory requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ESA scientists and specialists reviewing the document included senior planners, biologists, air quality/noise specialists, traffic engineers, hydrologists, geologists, and archeologists/historians, all who have considerable experience in the preparation of joint NEPA/CEQA documents.

August 10, 2009: Request to the City of Richmond to extend comment period on DEIS

 

August 2009: Ltr to Stand Up For California from City of San Pablo

 

July 8, 2009: Casino Managment Agreement

Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians of the Guidiville Rancheria and Mem Sah Corporation, A tribal Corporation and a Wholly -owned entity of the Rumsey Band of the Wintun Indians March 28, 2009

April 14, 2009 Second Supplement to response - Opposition

Restored Lands Determination

April 14, 2009 Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians--Indian Lands Determination Request

Attached please find Contra Costa County's Second Supplemental Response in Opposition to the Guidiville Band's Indians Lands Determination Request and Fee-to- Trust Application. In this third submittal, we respond to documents released to us since our last submittal. As you ( know, however, there are still outstanding documents. We believe that the County should have the opportunity to review all documents which will be considered in making the Indian Lands Determination. We also hope that we will be accorded sufficient time to prepare comments on those documents.

Save Point Molate - Power Point Presentation

 

COALITION TO SAVE POINT MOLATE

ACTION UPDATES: Say NO to false promises: Stop the Casino Development Project It is critical that concerns over issues of traffic, crime, public health, and the environment be raised. Please make every effort to attend the important Public Hearing in front of the City Planning Commission on Sept. 17th!

August 3, 2009: Trails for Richmond Action Committee

Letter of comment on proposed off reservation casino seeking additional mitigation.

July 2009: Guidiville DEIS

Public Hearings: Public hearings to receive comments on the DEIS/EIR will be held on August 12, 2009 at 6:00 p.m. and September 17, 2009 at 6:00 p.m., at the Richmond Memorial Auditorium, 403 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond, CA, 94804. Public Workshops: Workshops with technical experts will be held on August 10, 2009 at 6:00 p.m. and August 27,2009 at 6:00 p.m., at the Richmond Memorial Auditorium, 403 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond, CA, 94804. Report Availability: A copy of the Draft EIS/EIR is available for review online at wV'lW.ci.richmond.c8.usipiannina and at http://www.pointmolateeis-eir.com . Copies are also available at the following locations: Richmond Public Library, Main Branch 325 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond, CA 94804; and City of Richmond, Planning and Building Services Department, City Hall, 450 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond, CA, 94804. Start of Public Review: July 10, 2009 End of Public Review: September 23, 2009

May 2009: Ltr to City of Richmond-Upcoming EIR

Stand Up For California writes to advise the City of recent federal actions.

Dec. 3, 2008: Levine to City of Richmond

Mr. Levine reports to the City Manager that the project is on schedule, although he has yet to secure insurance.

Dec. 2008: Contra Costa County overview

Summary of status and actions of Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors regarding off Reservation casino proposals.

Oct. 30, 2008 Supplement to Response in Opposition

Restored Lands determination

Oct. 30, 2008 Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians--Indian Lands Determination Request

 

June 2008: City Council Study Session-Point Molate

Power Point Presentation provides a helpful timeline of events

June 2008: Public Request Act to Governor

Acknowledgment of communication regarding the Navy Land Transfer to the City of Richmond for the development of an off reservation casino with the Guidiville Band.

June 2008: Liquor Control Ordinance

Federal Register Notice

June 2008: Guidiville Band of Pomo v NGV Gaming of Florida and v. Harrah's

Argued and submitted October 16, 2007 - Opinion Filed 6-26-2008

April 2008: City of Richmond- Emergency Prepardeness

 

Feb. 27, 2008 Response in Opposition to Indian Lands Determination

Restored Lands Determination

Dec. 2007: Traffic Study -3 Casinos in the East Bay

 

Sept. 2006: Stand Up for Calif Challenges Testimony

Letter identifies errors and omissions in Chairman Gray's testimony before the House Resources Committee

June 23, 2006: IBIA Vedolla, Treppa v.Pacific Regional Director BIA

The Regional Director has declined to intervene in a membership dispute within the Guidiville Rancheria of California and remanded the matter to the Tribe for further consideration of the claim. While the Pacific Regional office has dismissed the current appeal for lack of jurisdiction, the Regional Director goes on to state: "...the dispute could possibly evolve into a problem concerning government to government relations, down the line in which case it might be necessary for BIA to intervene. The Regional Director expressed concern that there may be serious questions as to whether due process and equal protection in accordance with ICRA and strongly suggested that the Tribe reconsider all the facts in this case and re-evaluate its position.

May 12, 2006 Skibine Letter to Guidiville states process

 

April 13, 2006 - Guidiville Letter Preserve two part determination

 

Feb. 2006: Guidiville Requests Indian Lands Determination from NIGC

 

Jan. 13, 2006: Guidiville Report

The Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians Use and Occupancy of the San Francisco Bay Area

Jan. 2006: City of Richmond Settlement Agreement

Attorney General Lockyer

Oct. 2005: Ruling in favor of Guidiville Band

ruling against prior investor

July 2005: Chairman Gray Testimony

before the Senate Committee of Indian Affairs

June 2005: East Bay Regional Park District

letter of comment on the proposed off reservation casino

May 12, 2005: Amended Gaming Ordinance

2005 Ordiance in related items

March 2005: BIA Initiates EIS Process

Notice by the BIA to affected parties

Dec. 4, 2004: Guidiville Indian Rancheria Resolution

# 04-18 Authorization requesting BIA Pacific Regional Office to Begin Fee to Trust Process and Accompanying NEPA Process for the Restored Lands Acquisition of Former Point Molate Navel Fuel Deppot, City of Richmond, California.

Nov. 4, 2003: Solano County Resolution Opposing Casino

Item #22 Solano County Supervisors opposed the proposed off reservation casino of Guidiville, at Mare Island, Solano County Fairgrounds and City of Suisun.

2003: Coast Guard- Point Molate Homeland Security Issue

 

Sept. 30, 2003: Pt. Molate Deed Restrictions

In 2003 the Department of the Navy and the San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Board entered into a covenant to restrict use of the property at the former Naval Fuel Depot at Point Molate. The Dept. of the Navy and the Water Board have further concluded that certain uses and activities need to be prohibited within Disposal Areas 1,2,6,11,12. Shall not be used for a residence for use as residential human habitation nor hospitals for humans, schools for persons under 21 years of age, day care centers for children or any permanently occupied human habitation.

August 25, 2003: Chevron Texeco - Homeland Security Issue

Since September 11, security reviews of our refinery have been conducted by the US Coast Guard, the FBI and Chevron Texeco. These reviews raise serious concerns in connection with any future use of the Point Molate property.

1999: Tribal Information and Directory - BIA

 

1991 - Corrected Order for Judgement.pdf

 

March 1991: Scotts Valley and Guidiville Stipulated Judgement

 

1958 - 1974: Grant Deeds Guidiville Village Association

 

August 1958: Plan for Distribribution of Assets

 

1958:Guidiville Rancheria-Distribution of assets and Distributees

Please note, the land that was sold was in accordance with federal regulations and the proceeds were equally distributed to the distributees of the list. There was no takings the individuals received fair compensation.

1955- List of Rancheria Assignees

Land has been allotted to individuals

June 29, 1909: Guidiville-Legal Description and Map

 

June 1935: Letter from BIA outlining the IRA vote

Letter details potential eligible voters and minimally outlines the process.

1914 Memo Education Supplies.pdf

 

Pomo: Introduction

Includes map of Northern Pomo - which includes Guidiville Rancheria Sally McLendon and Robert L. Oswalt Smithsonian's authoritative Handbook of North American Tribes Volume 8, California 1978. Guidiville Tribe are historically viewed as Northeastern Pomo residing in Mendocino County area. See pertinent portions of the Handbook pages 283, 286,-87 and 302.

Western Pomo and Northeastern Pomo

Lowell John Bean and Dorothea Theodoratus Smithsonian's authoritative Handbook of North American Tribes Volume 8, California 1978. Guidiville Tribe are historically viewed as Northeastern Pomo residing in Mendocino County area. See pertinent portions of the Handbook pages 283, 286,-87 and 302.

Maps and description of Guidiville Rancheria

Bureau of Indian Affairs - 1999 and State of California 2000.

With sale closing date near, Richmond casino financing questions linger

By Katherine Tam Contra Costa Times 01/08/2010

Your Turn: Richmond casino bad idea for poor and middle class

By Richard Kincaide Guest commentary 01/09/2010 Contra Costa Times

Save Point Molate: Video