Document Actions

Big Sandy

Up one level
June 7, 2011: FOIA Response from BIA
 
April 25, 2011: FOIA Response from Pacific Regional Office
 
April 21, 2011: FOIA Response from Tribal Operations
 
April 12, 2011: State of California Comments on DEIS
The land upon which the project is proposed does not meet the legal threshold of IGRA, moreover, the project as planned violates the Tribe's tribal state compact.
April 12, 2011: Comments on Big Sandy DEIS
Stand Up For California submits comments on Big Sandy off reservation proposal
March 29, 2011: NIGC Responds to Stand Up For California
NIGC has no record of a new investor for the Big Sandy Band. The information was requested as the Tribe stated they had a new investor.
March 22, 2011: Fresno Board of Supervisors Agenda Item
Draft comments for review by the BOS.
March 21, 2011: FOIA Request on Big Sandy
 
March 7, 2011: Notice of Extension for DEIS
Comments Due April 12, 2011
March 2, 2011: Brownstone's Motion to dismiss
Big Sandy v Brownstone
Feb. 28, 2011: FOIA Request of NIGC - Who is the new investor?
Big Sandy is suing its current investor and states that it has a new investor.
Feb. 3, 2011: Big Sandy v Brownstone
Big Sandy complaint against Brownstone the investor
Jan. 27, 2011: Stand Up For California to BIA
Request to be added to notification list and a copy of the DEIS on CD.
Jan. 14, 2011: Notice of Application for Gaming
 
July 2, 2010: NIGC Review of Contracts
Investor Brownstone LLC
Sept. 2006: NIGC - approves gaming on allotment
 
September 27, 2005: Fresno County letter to BIA
 
Sept. 2005: Governor ltr to NIGC
Indian Lands Opinion
March 28, 1983: Stipulation for Judgment in Big Sandy v. Watts
 
Big Sandy Indian lands from NIGC
 
Narrative re Rancheria.pdf
 

Personal tools